Are you part of a joint family? Or have you worked on any group projects? Or have you planned a trip with your friends?

If your answer is ‘yes’ to any of these questions, you would know how difficult it is to agree unanimously on something as a group. When many people are involved, it takes a lot of time to convince everyone to reach a conclusion.

Now think of blockchain, which is decentralized. Several nodes across the globe work together to make critical decisions.

How do they even do that? Well, they use a tool called ‘Consensus Mechanism.’

In this post, we will explore the concept of the consensus mechanism and its types. Also, I will answer how nodes reach a consensus in the blockchain network using these methods.

But before jumping into the consensus mechanism, we hope cryptocurrency is part of your investment portfolio; if not, check out Mudrex Coin Sets. It is an index fund-like product suitable for long-term wealth generation.

Definition of Consensus Mechanisms

The technical definition of ‘Consensus Mechanism’ goes like this.

A consensus mechanism is a fault-tolerant method used by multiple agents or network participants in blockchain protocol to agree upon a single network state. It is mainly helpful in distributed record-keeping.

I know it might be confusing. Let me break it down further.

So the term ‘Consensus’ means a general agreement. It is the opinion or decision reached by a group as a whole.

From a blockchain standpoint, a consensus is a process by which a group of participants (or nodes) on a network finalizes whether a blockchain transaction is valid.

Consensus mechanisms are the methods utilized to reach this agreement. They are a standard set of rules that safeguard the network from bad actors. The consensus mechanisms are also known as consensus protocols or consensus algorithms.

There are different types of consensus mechanisms, and they vary based on several factors. These factors include security level, throughput capability, energy consumption, etc.

But all of them share one common goal: to ensure the ledger records are honest.

Why Blockchains Require Consensus Mechanisms

Consensus mechanisms are the foundation for blockchain networks to function seamlessly.

Before we explore its importance, let’s look at how blockchain protocols work.

A public blockchain is a decentralized, distributed ledger that records transactions in the form of blocks of data. Peer-to-peer computer nodes must independently validate these blocks before adding them to the chain.

This method helps in securing the network against fraudulent transactions and double-spending. As multiple parties must agree on a single version of the ledger, the networks implement consensus mechanisms to achieve it.

Types of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms

If you are following cryptocurrencies and blockchain, you might have heard of terms like Proof of Work or Proof of Stake.

Well, these are some of the well-known consensus mechanisms. But apart from these two, there are many other algorithms in use.

We will look into the top eight protocols in detail.

1. Proof of Work (PoW)

Proof of Work (PoW) was the first consensus mechanism to come into existence. The term was first coined during the 1990s but was implemented by Satoshi Nakamoto in Bitcoin. After which it was adopted by other blockchains of that time. PoW is typically considered the most secure and reliable protocol compared to others.

Stakeholders: Miners

Working Mechanism: Miners use sophisticated hardware infrastructure and mining methods to compete with each other to crack highly complex mathematical puzzles. They can solve these with numerous trials and errors. Hence, miners require a staggering amount of computational power to solve the puzzles quickly. The first miner to find the 64-digit hexadecimal number (known as ‘hash’) wins the right to form a new block and validate the transactions.

Reward System: The successful miner is rewarded with a predetermined amount of crypto, known as the block reward. 

Merits:

  • Secure
  • Decentralized

Risks:

  • High operating cost
  • High energy consumption
  • High barrier of entry for new miners
  • Limited scalability

Used By: Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), and Dogecoin (DOGE)

2. Proof of Stake (PoS)

Bitcoin’s estimated annual energy consumption is over 51 TWh. This is the impact of the PoW mechanism. Hence, a lot of projects started to explore methods that are more sustainable and scalable. It led to the emergence of another popular protocol called the Proof of Stake (PoS)

Stakeholders: Validators

Working Mechanism: While PoW is like a race, PoS is more like randomly assigning network participants to produce the next block. But, users must stake their crypto tokens in the network to participate in this process. Typically, the higher the number of staked coins, the higher the chance of becoming a validator. Other factors include time since staked, randomization, etc.

Reward System: Validators earn crypto rewards for successfully validating the block.

Merits:

  • Scalable
  • Secure
  • Sustainable and environment-friendly

Risks: Scope for centralization

Used By: Ethereum (ETH), Cardano (ADA), and Tezos (XTC)

3. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a modified version of the Proof of Stake (PoS) mechanism.

Stakeholders: Witnesses, Validators, and Delegates

Working Mechanism: Like PoS, DPoS allows users to stake their coins in return for staking rewards. The difference between PoS and DPoS is that DPoS relies upon a reputation-based voting system to achieve consensus. In DPoS, users who staked their tokens can vote to select witnesses to create blocks by validating the transactions. Only top-tier witnesses with the most votes earn the validation rights. Validators are responsible for validating the blocks created by the witnesses. The users also vote to select delegates to govern the protocol.

Reward System: Witnesses earn rewards for their contributions, which are then shared with the users who voted for them.

Merits:

  • Scalable
  • Democratic system
  • Sustainable and environment-friendly

Risks:

  • Scope for centralization
  • Security risk due to the presence of a limited number of witnesses

Used By: Cosmos (ATOM), TRON (TRX), EOS (EOS), Steem (STEEM), and BitShares (BTS)

4. Proof of Capacity (PoC)

Proof of Capacity (PoC) is also known as Proof of Space (PoSpace). As the name suggests, the mining rights are granted based on the amount of space available in the miner’s hard drive.

Stakeholders: Miners

Working Mechanism: In PoC, miners generate a list of all possible hashes (64-digit hexadecimal numbers) in advance. This process is called ‘Plotting.’ These hashes are then stored on a hard drive. Miners with higher storage capacity can generate more hashes. It increases the chance of having the correct combination and producing a new block.

Reward System: The successful miner gets the block reward. 

Merits:

  • Low barrier of entry as it doesn’t require expensive tools
  • Improves the transaction speed
  • Energy efficient

Risks: Limited adoption

Used By: Signum (SIGNA), Storj (STORJ), and Chia (XCH).

5. Proof of History (PoH)

Solana developed Proof of History (PoH). It is a method to prove that transactions occurred at a specific time.

Stakeholders: Validators

Working Mechanism: Typically, public blockchains didn’t rely on a standardized clock. The validator nodes use their local time without the visibility of other nodes’ clocks. Hence, it would take time for the nodes to identify the exact validation time. But, with the help of the PoH method, all network participants can access a single trusted time source.

Reward System: PoH doesn’t have any in-built reward mechanism. But, it works along with other consensus mechanisms (like PoS), which rewards its validators.

Merits:

  • Improves transaction speed
  • Less energy intensive

Risks: Limited adoption

Used By: Solana (SOL)

6. Proof of Activity (PoA)

Proof of Activity (PoA) is a hybrid of PoW and PoS mechanisms.

Stakeholders: Miners and Validators

Working Mechanism: PoA kickstarts the PoW process first. The miners use computing power to solve complex computational puzzles. Once the block is mined, the system switches to PoS. The higher the number of staked cryptos, the higher the chance of being chosen as a validator. The block gets added to the network once the validator verifies it.

Reward System: Block rewards are shared among the miners and validators.

Merits: High energy consumption

Risks: Scope for centralization

Used By: Decred (DCR) and Espers (ESP).

7. Proof of Authority (PoA)

Proof of Authority (PoA) is a modified version of PoS. It was proposed by Gavin Wood, Ethereum co-founder, in 2017.

Stakeholders: Validators

Working Mechanism: In the PoA system, the users stake their reputation instead of cryptos to get validation rights. Unlike other blockchain networks, users must reveal their identity to participate in the process.

Reward System: Validators are offered token rewards for their contribution.

Merits:

  • Scalable
  • Less resource intensive

Risks: 

  • Scope for centralization
  • Prone to censorship

Used By: VeChain (VET) and Ethereum Kovan testnet.

8. Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET)

Intel developed Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) in 2016. It is an effective alternative to the PoW mechanism.

Stakeholders: Miners

Working Mechanism: PoET randomly assigns different waiting times to all network participants. Each of these nodes goes to sleep for the respective waiting duration. The node with the shortest waiting time is awarded mining rights. It ensures fairness within the network by offering equal opportunity to all participants.

Reward System: The successful miner gets the block reward. 

Merits:

  • Highly efficient
  • Scalable
  • Less resource intensive

Risks: Applicable only to closed and permissioned networks.

Used By: Hyperledger’s Sawtooth

Conclusion 

Self-regulating systems like blockchains work on a global scale without any single authority. They need hundreds of thousands of participants to authenticate blockchain transactions.

This complicated task is executed with the help of consensus mechanisms. It helps to ensure all the network transactions are genuine and enables the nodes to agree on the status of the ledger. 

Every blockchain cannot use the same consensus mechanism as they solve different purposes. Also, each mechanism has its benefits and drawbacks. Hence, developers must make an informed decision while choosing a consensus mechanism for their blockchain projects

FAQs

1. What is the best blockchain consensus?

It depends on the objective of the blockchain network. If you want a high level of decentralization and security, then Proof of Work (PoW) is the right choice. If scalability and energy efficiency is your priority, then Proof of Stake (PoS) and its derivatives, like Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), can be an excellent choice.

2.  What form of consensus can be achieved with a blockchain?

The Blockchain consensus algorithm focus on achieving certain objectives.

These include the following,

  • Validation of network transactions to agree on a single data state of the network. It helps to prevent malicious activities like double spending attacks.
  • Ensuring positive collaboration and cooperation among the network participants. This is performed through multiple ways like randomization, voting mechanism, round robin, or a mixture of many.

3.  Can blockchain work without a consensus mechanism?

Blockchain is a distributed decentralized network with no central authority to validate transactions. In protocols like Bitcoin, hundreds of thousands of unknown peers (or miners) across the globe need to agree on a single state of the network. A consensus mechanism helps to just do that. Hence, it is essential to have one to verify network transactions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trusted by 1M+ Users for Easy Crypto Investments
Invest in 350+ Cryptocurrencies Now!