Re

• Re brings reinsurance on-chain, letting capital back fully collateralised reinsurance contracts.

• Returns derive from insurance premiums rather than from crypto market activity.

• RE is the protocol token.

• Supply allocated across community, ecosystem and contributors.

• Governs underwriting parameters and capital allocation.

Pros:

• Insurance returns are genuinely uncorrelated with crypto markets, which few yield sources are.

• Full collateralisation removes the leverage that amplifies losses in traditional reinsurance.

• Works with regulated insurance entities rather than operating outside them.

Cons:

• Catastrophe losses are lumpy: years of steady returns can be erased by a single event.

• Underwriting quality cannot be assessed by depositors.

• Insurance regulation varies sharply by jurisdiction and constrains where capital can be deployed.

• Exposure to genuinely uncorrelated yield, which is rare in crypto.

• Full collateralisation is more conservative than traditional reinsurance leverage.

• Understand that insurance losses arrive suddenly and in size.

• Fully collateralised reinsurance exposure, giving on-chain capital access to a return stream with no correlation to crypto markets.

• Reinsurance capital is locked behind institutional access and long commitment periods.

• Tokenising the exposure opens it to smaller allocators, who then bear the same catastrophe risk.

• Operates with regulated insurance entities.

• Core contributor identities are partially public.

• No public ICO. Distributed through ecosystem and community allocations.

• Catastrophe losses can be severe and arrive without warning.

• Underwriting quality is unverifiable by depositors.

• Insurance regulation constrains deployment by jurisdiction.

• Capital may be locked for the duration of contract terms.